Gender gaps
Female labour-force participation
The Philippines has the lowest female participation among Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam and Indonesia. The regional view also includes Myanmar, which is lower.
% of female population aged 15+
MODELLED ILO / WDI · 2025SEA-11 · Singapore is regional context, outside the peer five. Regional scales stay fixed when filtering.
| Country | % of female population aged 15+ 0100 | Year | Source & notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cambodia | 77.4 | 2025 | World Bank WDI SL.TLF.CACT.FE.ZS (modeled ILO estimate) · year 2025 · as_of 2026-09-06 Observation notesFemale LFPR (% of female population ages 15+). Modeled ILO estimate via WDI. API-verified 2026-09-06. Original CSV value: 77.351. |
| Vietnam | 68.6 | 2025 | World Bank WDI SL.TLF.CACT.FE.ZS (modeled ILO estimate) · year 2025 · as_of 2026-09-06 Observation notesFemale LFPR (% of female population ages 15+). Modeled ILO estimate via WDI. API-verified 2026-09-06. Original CSV value: 68.551. |
| Singapore | 63.6 | 2025 | World Bank WDI SL.TLF.CACT.FE.ZS (modeled ILO estimate) · year 2025 · as_of 2026-09-06 Observation notesFemale LFPR (% of female population ages 15+). Modeled ILO estimate via WDI. API-verified 2026-09-06. Original CSV value: 63.569. |
| Timor-Leste | 61.7 | 2025 | World Bank WDI SL.TLF.CACT.FE.ZS (modeled ILO estimate) · year 2025 · as_of 2026-09-06 Observation notesFemale LFPR (% of female population ages 15+). Modeled ILO estimate via WDI. API-verified 2026-09-06. Original CSV value: 61.676. |
| Laos | 61.6 | 2025 | World Bank WDI SL.TLF.CACT.FE.ZS (modeled ILO estimate) · year 2025 · as_of 2026-09-06 Observation notesFemale LFPR (% of female population ages 15+). Modeled ILO estimate via WDI. API-verified 2026-09-06. Original CSV value: 61.56. |
| Thailand | 59.0 | 2025 | World Bank WDI SL.TLF.CACT.FE.ZS (modeled ILO estimate) · year 2025 · as_of 2026-09-06 Observation notesFemale LFPR (% of female population ages 15+). Modeled ILO estimate via WDI. API-verified 2026-09-06. Original CSV value: 58.963. |
| Brunei | 54.4 | 2025 | World Bank WDI SL.TLF.CACT.FE.ZS (modeled ILO estimate) · year 2025 · as_of 2026-09-06 Observation notesFemale LFPR (% of female population ages 15+). Modeled ILO estimate via WDI. API-verified 2026-09-06. Original CSV value: 54.436. |
| Indonesia | 53.7 | 2025 | World Bank WDI SL.TLF.CACT.FE.ZS (modeled ILO estimate) · year 2025 · as_of 2026-09-06 Observation notesFemale LFPR (% of female population ages 15+). Modeled ILO estimate via WDI. API-verified 2026-09-06. Original CSV value: 53.72. |
| Malaysia | 51.6 | 2025 | World Bank WDI SL.TLF.CACT.FE.ZS (modeled ILO estimate) · year 2025 · as_of 2026-09-06 Observation notesFemale LFPR (% of female population ages 15+). Modeled ILO estimate via WDI. API-verified 2026-09-06. Original CSV value: 51.643. |
| Philippines | 50.5 | 2025 | World Bank WDI SL.TLF.CACT.FE.ZS (modeled ILO estimate) · year 2025 · as_of 2026-09-06 Observation notesFemale LFPR (% of female population ages 15+). Modeled ILO estimate via WDI. API-verified 2026-09-06. Original CSV value: 50.489. |
| Myanmar | 40.9 | 2025 | World Bank WDI SL.TLF.CACT.FE.ZS (modeled ILO estimate) · year 2025 · as_of 2026-09-06 Observation notesFemale LFPR (% of female population ages 15+). Modeled ILO estimate via WDI. API-verified 2026-09-06. Original CSV value: 40.941. |
Philippines highlighted. Bars start at zero; gaps have no bars. GII sorts from lower to higher inequality; other panels sort by descending value.
Labour-force participation gap
The gap subtracts female from male participation using same-year modelled ILO observations. Percentage points are not a percentage change.
Percentage points · male minus female
MODELLED ILO / WDI · 2025SEA-11 · Singapore is regional context, outside the peer five. Regional scales stay fixed when filtering.
| Country | Percentage points · male minus female 040 | Year | Source & notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Myanmar | 28.7 | 2025 | Derived: WDI male LFPR − female LFPR (SL.TLF.CACT.MA.ZS − SL.TLF.CACT.FE.ZS) · year 2025 · as_of 2026-09-06 Observation notesGender LFPR gap in percentage points (male minus female). Positive = male participation higher. Derived from same-year WDI modeled ILO. Original CSV value: 28.719. |
| Indonesia | 28.6 | 2025 | Derived: WDI male LFPR − female LFPR (SL.TLF.CACT.MA.ZS − SL.TLF.CACT.FE.ZS) · year 2025 · as_of 2026-09-06 Observation notesGender LFPR gap in percentage points (male minus female). Positive = male participation higher. Derived from same-year WDI modeled ILO. Original CSV value: 28.558. |
| Malaysia | 27.6 | 2025 | Derived: WDI male LFPR − female LFPR (SL.TLF.CACT.MA.ZS − SL.TLF.CACT.FE.ZS) · year 2025 · as_of 2026-09-06 Observation notesGender LFPR gap in percentage points (male minus female). Positive = male participation higher. Derived from same-year WDI modeled ILO. Original CSV value: 27.568. |
| Philippines | 22.0 | 2025 | Derived: WDI male LFPR − female LFPR (SL.TLF.CACT.MA.ZS − SL.TLF.CACT.FE.ZS) · year 2025 · as_of 2026-09-06 Observation notesGender LFPR gap in percentage points (male minus female). Positive = male participation higher. Derived from same-year WDI modeled ILO. Original CSV value: 21.975. |
| Brunei | 18.4 | 2025 | Derived: WDI male LFPR − female LFPR (SL.TLF.CACT.MA.ZS − SL.TLF.CACT.FE.ZS) · year 2025 · as_of 2026-09-06 Observation notesGender LFPR gap in percentage points (male minus female). Positive = male participation higher. Derived from same-year WDI modeled ILO. Original CSV value: 18.366. |
| Thailand | 16.0 | 2025 | Derived: WDI male LFPR − female LFPR (SL.TLF.CACT.MA.ZS − SL.TLF.CACT.FE.ZS) · year 2025 · as_of 2026-09-06 Observation notesGender LFPR gap in percentage points (male minus female). Positive = male participation higher. Derived from same-year WDI modeled ILO. Original CSV value: 16.018. |
| Singapore | 11.8 | 2025 | Derived: WDI male LFPR − female LFPR (SL.TLF.CACT.MA.ZS − SL.TLF.CACT.FE.ZS) · year 2025 · as_of 2026-09-06 Observation notesGender LFPR gap in percentage points (male minus female). Positive = male participation higher. Derived from same-year WDI modeled ILO. Original CSV value: 11.803. |
| Timor-Leste | 10.6 | 2025 | Derived: WDI male LFPR − female LFPR (SL.TLF.CACT.MA.ZS − SL.TLF.CACT.FE.ZS) · year 2025 · as_of 2026-09-06 Observation notesGender LFPR gap in percentage points (male minus female). Positive = male participation higher. Derived from same-year WDI modeled ILO. Original CSV value: 10.571. |
| Cambodia | 10.5 | 2025 | Derived: WDI male LFPR − female LFPR (SL.TLF.CACT.MA.ZS − SL.TLF.CACT.FE.ZS) · year 2025 · as_of 2026-09-06 Observation notesGender LFPR gap in percentage points (male minus female). Positive = male participation higher. Derived from same-year WDI modeled ILO. Original CSV value: 10.465. |
| Laos | 9.1 | 2025 | Derived: WDI male LFPR − female LFPR (SL.TLF.CACT.MA.ZS − SL.TLF.CACT.FE.ZS) · year 2025 · as_of 2026-09-06 Observation notesGender LFPR gap in percentage points (male minus female). Positive = male participation higher. Derived from same-year WDI modeled ILO. Original CSV value: 9.069. |
| Vietnam | 8.8 | 2025 | Derived: WDI male LFPR − female LFPR (SL.TLF.CACT.MA.ZS − SL.TLF.CACT.FE.ZS) · year 2025 · as_of 2026-09-06 Observation notesGender LFPR gap in percentage points (male minus female). Positive = male participation higher. Derived from same-year WDI modeled ILO. Original CSV value: 8.777. |
Philippines highlighted. Bars start at zero; gaps have no bars. GII sorts from lower to higher inequality; other panels sort by descending value.
Women in parliament
Myanmar retains its older 2021 observation and political-context caveat. Brunei’s Legislative Council is appointed; the shares do not establish equivalent electoral systems.
% of parliamentary seats
WDI / IPU · MIXED VINTAGESSEA-11 · Singapore is regional context, outside the peer five. Regional scales stay fixed when filtering.
| Country | % of parliamentary seats 0100 | Year | Source & notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Timor-Leste | 35.4 | 2025 | World Bank WDI SG.GEN.PARL.ZS (Inter-Parliamentary Union) · year 2025 · as_of 2026-09-06 Observation notesProportion of seats held by women in national parliaments (%). WDI series sourced from IPU. Original CSV value: 35.3846153846154. |
| Singapore | 32.3 | 2025 | World Bank WDI SG.GEN.PARL.ZS (Inter-Parliamentary Union) · year 2025 · as_of 2026-09-06 Observation notesProportion of seats held by women in national parliaments (%). WDI series sourced from IPU. Original CSV value: 32.3232323232323. |
| Vietnam | 31.4 | 2025 | World Bank WDI SG.GEN.PARL.ZS (Inter-Parliamentary Union) · year 2025 · as_of 2026-09-06 Observation notesProportion of seats held by women in national parliaments (%). WDI series sourced from IPU. Original CSV value: 31.3807531380753. |
| Philippines | 28.3 | 2025 | World Bank WDI SG.GEN.PARL.ZS (Inter-Parliamentary Union) · year 2025 · as_of 2026-09-06 Observation notesProportion of seats held by women in national parliaments (%). WDI series sourced from IPU. Original CSV value: 28.343949044586. |
| Laos | 22.0 | 2025 | World Bank WDI SG.GEN.PARL.ZS (Inter-Parliamentary Union) · year 2025 · as_of 2026-09-06 Observation notesProportion of seats held by women in national parliaments (%). WDI series sourced from IPU. Original CSV value: 21.9512195121951. |
| Indonesia | 21.9 | 2025 | World Bank WDI SG.GEN.PARL.ZS (Inter-Parliamentary Union) · year 2025 · as_of 2026-09-06 Observation notesProportion of seats held by women in national parliaments (%). WDI series sourced from IPU. Original CSV value: 21.8965517241379. |
| Thailand | 19.6 | 2025 | World Bank WDI SG.GEN.PARL.ZS (Inter-Parliamentary Union) · year 2025 · as_of 2026-09-06 Observation notesProportion of seats held by women in national parliaments (%). WDI series sourced from IPU. Original CSV value: 19.5959595959596. |
| MyanmarOlder observation · political context | 15.3 | †2021 · OLDER | World Bank WDI SG.GEN.PARL.ZS (Inter-Parliamentary Union) · year 2021 · as_of 2026-09-06 Observation notesProportion of seats held by women in national parliaments (%). WDI series sourced from IPU. Vintage 2021 (latest WDI). STALE relative to peers on 2025 — badge year. Myanmar political context caveat. Original CSV value: 15.2941176470588. |
| Cambodia | 13.6 | 2025 | World Bank WDI SG.GEN.PARL.ZS (Inter-Parliamentary Union) · year 2025 · as_of 2026-09-06 Observation notesProportion of seats held by women in national parliaments (%). WDI series sourced from IPU. Original CSV value: 13.6. |
| Malaysia | 13.5 | 2025 | World Bank WDI SG.GEN.PARL.ZS (Inter-Parliamentary Union) · year 2025 · as_of 2026-09-06 Observation notesProportion of seats held by women in national parliaments (%). WDI series sourced from IPU. Original CSV value: 13.5135135135135. |
| BruneiAppointed Legislative Council | 11.4 | 2025 | World Bank WDI SG.GEN.PARL.ZS (Inter-Parliamentary Union) · year 2025 · as_of 2026-09-06 Observation notesProportion of seats held by women in national parliaments (%). WDI series sourced from IPU. Brunei appointed Legislative Council — interpret with institutional caveat. Original CSV value: 11.4285714285714. |
Philippines highlighted. Bars start at zero; gaps have no bars. GII sorts from lower to higher inequality; other panels sort by descending value.
UNDP Gender Inequality Index
Lower GII indicates less inequality. This index is separate from WEF gender parity: the two indices have different constructs and opposite directions.
Index 0–1 · higher = more inequality
UNDP GII · 2023SEA-11 · Singapore is regional context, outside the peer five. Regional scales stay fixed when filtering.
| Country | Index 0–1 · higher = more inequality 01 | Year | Source & notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Singapore | 0.031Global rank 8 | 2023 | UNDP Human Development Report 2025 Statistical Annex Table 5 (GII 2023 values) · year 2023 · as_of 2026-09-06 UNDP Human Development Report 2025 Statistical Annex Table 5 (GII 2023 ranks) · year 2023 · as_of 2026-09-06 Observation notesGender Inequality Index (0=equality, higher=more inequality). Rank 8 of HDR 2025 table. Original CSV value: 0.031. |
| Malaysia | 0.172Global rank 47 | 2023 | UNDP Human Development Report 2025 Statistical Annex Table 5 (GII 2023 values) · year 2023 · as_of 2026-09-06 UNDP Human Development Report 2025 Statistical Annex Table 5 (GII 2023 ranks) · year 2023 · as_of 2026-09-06 Observation notesGender Inequality Index (0=equality, higher=more inequality). Rank 47 of HDR 2025 table. Original CSV value: 0.172. |
| Brunei | 0.257Global rank 66 | 2023 | UNDP Human Development Report 2025 Statistical Annex Table 5 (GII 2023 values) · year 2023 · as_of 2026-09-06 UNDP Human Development Report 2025 Statistical Annex Table 5 (GII 2023 ranks) · year 2023 · as_of 2026-09-06 Observation notesGender Inequality Index (0=equality, higher=more inequality). Rank 66 of HDR 2025 table. Original CSV value: 0.257. |
| Thailand | 0.288Global rank 73 | 2023 | UNDP Human Development Report 2025 Statistical Annex Table 5 (GII 2023 values) · year 2023 · as_of 2026-09-06 UNDP Human Development Report 2025 Statistical Annex Table 5 (GII 2023 ranks) · year 2023 · as_of 2026-09-06 Observation notesGender Inequality Index (0=equality, higher=more inequality). Rank 73 of HDR 2025 table. Original CSV value: 0.288. |
| Vietnam | 0.299Global rank 78 | 2023 | UNDP Human Development Report 2025 Statistical Annex Table 5 (GII 2023 values) · year 2023 · as_of 2026-09-06 UNDP Human Development Report 2025 Statistical Annex Table 5 (GII 2023 ranks) · year 2023 · as_of 2026-09-06 Observation notesGender Inequality Index (0=equality, higher=more inequality). Rank 78 of HDR 2025 table. Original CSV value: 0.299. |
| Philippines | 0.351Global rank 86 | 2023 | UNDP Human Development Report 2025 Statistical Annex Table 5 (GII 2023 values) · year 2023 · as_of 2026-09-06 UNDP Human Development Report 2025 Statistical Annex Table 5 (GII 2023 ranks) · year 2023 · as_of 2026-09-06 Observation notesGender Inequality Index (0=equality, higher=more inequality). Rank 86 of HDR 2025 table. Original CSV value: 0.351. |
| Timor-Leste | 0.394Global rank 99 | 2023 | UNDP Human Development Report 2025 Statistical Annex Table 5 (GII 2023 values) · year 2023 · as_of 2026-09-06 UNDP Human Development Report 2025 Statistical Annex Table 5 (GII 2023 ranks) · year 2023 · as_of 2026-09-06 Observation notesGender Inequality Index (0=equality, higher=more inequality). Rank 99 of HDR 2025 table. Original CSV value: 0.394. |
| Indonesia | 0.423Global rank 108 | 2023 | UNDP Human Development Report 2025 Statistical Annex Table 5 (GII 2023 values) · year 2023 · as_of 2026-09-06 UNDP Human Development Report 2025 Statistical Annex Table 5 (GII 2023 ranks) · year 2023 · as_of 2026-09-06 Observation notesGender Inequality Index (0=equality, higher=more inequality). Rank 108 of HDR 2025 table. Original CSV value: 0.423. |
| Laos | 0.475Global rank 117 | 2023 | UNDP Human Development Report 2025 Statistical Annex Table 5 (GII 2023 values) · year 2023 · as_of 2026-09-06 UNDP Human Development Report 2025 Statistical Annex Table 5 (GII 2023 ranks) · year 2023 · as_of 2026-09-06 Observation notesGender Inequality Index (0=equality, higher=more inequality). Rank 117 of HDR 2025 table. Original CSV value: 0.475. |
| Myanmar | 0.478Global rank 118 | 2023 | UNDP Human Development Report 2025 Statistical Annex Table 5 (GII 2023 values) · year 2023 · as_of 2026-09-06 UNDP Human Development Report 2025 Statistical Annex Table 5 (GII 2023 ranks) · year 2023 · as_of 2026-09-06 Observation notesGender Inequality Index (0=equality, higher=more inequality). Rank 118 of HDR 2025 table. Original CSV value: 0.478. |
| Cambodia | 0.506Global rank 136 | 2023 | UNDP Human Development Report 2025 Statistical Annex Table 5 (GII 2023 values) · year 2023 · as_of 2026-09-06 UNDP Human Development Report 2025 Statistical Annex Table 5 (GII 2023 ranks) · year 2023 · as_of 2026-09-06 Observation notesGender Inequality Index (0=equality, higher=more inequality). Rank 136 of HDR 2025 table. Original CSV value: 0.506. |
Philippines highlighted. Bars start at zero; gaps have no bars. GII sorts from lower to higher inequality; other panels sort by descending value.
WEF Global Gender Gap Index
The Philippines leads the published regional scores, but that does not mean gender gaps are closed. Myanmar has no score or rank in this edition.
Index 0–1 · higher = more parity
WEF GGG · 2025SEA-11 · Singapore is regional context, outside the peer five. Regional scales stay fixed when filtering.
| Country | Index 0–1 · higher = more parity 01 | Year | Source & notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Philippines | 0.781Global rank 20 | 2025 | World Economic Forum Global Gender Gap Report 2025 · year 2025 · as_of 2026-09-06 World Economic Forum Global Gender Gap Report 2025 · year 2025 · as_of 2026-09-06 Observation notesGGGI score 0–1 (higher=more parity). Global rank 20. Cross-checked vs published 2025 rankings table. Original CSV value: 0.781. |
| Singapore | 0.748Global rank 47 | 2025 | World Economic Forum Global Gender Gap Report 2025 · year 2025 · as_of 2026-09-06 World Economic Forum Global Gender Gap Report 2025 · year 2025 · as_of 2026-09-06 Observation notesGGGI score 0–1 (higher=more parity). Global rank 47. Cross-checked vs published 2025 rankings table. Original CSV value: 0.748. |
| Thailand | 0.728Global rank 66 | 2025 | World Economic Forum Global Gender Gap Report 2025 · year 2025 · as_of 2026-09-06 World Economic Forum Global Gender Gap Report 2025 · year 2025 · as_of 2026-09-06 Observation notesGGGI score 0–1 (higher=more parity). Global rank 66. Cross-checked vs published 2025 rankings table. Original CSV value: 0.728. |
| Vietnam | 0.713Global rank 74 | 2025 | World Economic Forum Global Gender Gap Report 2025 · year 2025 · as_of 2026-09-06 World Economic Forum Global Gender Gap Report 2025 · year 2025 · as_of 2026-09-06 Observation notesGGGI score 0–1 (higher=more parity). Global rank 74. Cross-checked vs published 2025 rankings table. Original CSV value: 0.713. |
| Timor-Leste | 0.704Global rank 86 | 2025 | World Economic Forum Global Gender Gap Report 2025 · year 2025 · as_of 2026-09-06 World Economic Forum Global Gender Gap Report 2025 · year 2025 · as_of 2026-09-06 Observation notesGGGI score 0–1 (higher=more parity). Global rank 86. Cross-checked vs published 2025 rankings table. Original CSV value: 0.704. |
| Indonesia | 0.692Global rank 97 | 2025 | World Economic Forum Global Gender Gap Report 2025 · year 2025 · as_of 2026-09-06 World Economic Forum Global Gender Gap Report 2025 · year 2025 · as_of 2026-09-06 Observation notesGGGI score 0–1 (higher=more parity). Global rank 97. Cross-checked vs published 2025 rankings table. Original CSV value: 0.692. |
| Laos | 0.692Global rank 96 | 2025 | World Economic Forum Global Gender Gap Report 2025 · year 2025 · as_of 2026-09-06 World Economic Forum Global Gender Gap Report 2025 · year 2025 · as_of 2026-09-06 Observation notesGGGI score 0–1 (higher=more parity). Global rank 96. Cross-checked vs published 2025 rankings table. Original CSV value: 0.692. |
| Cambodia | 0.682Global rank 106 | 2025 | World Economic Forum Global Gender Gap Report 2025 · year 2025 · as_of 2026-09-06 World Economic Forum Global Gender Gap Report 2025 · year 2025 · as_of 2026-09-06 Observation notesGGGI score 0–1 (higher=more parity). Global rank 106. Cross-checked vs published 2025 rankings table. Original CSV value: 0.682. |
| Brunei | 0.681Global rank 107 | 2025 | World Economic Forum Global Gender Gap Report 2025 · year 2025 · as_of 2026-09-06 World Economic Forum Global Gender Gap Report 2025 · year 2025 · as_of 2026-09-06 Observation notesGGGI score 0–1 (higher=more parity). Global rank 107. Cross-checked vs published 2025 rankings table. Original CSV value: 0.681. |
| Malaysia | 0.681Global rank 108 | 2025 | World Economic Forum Global Gender Gap Report 2025 · year 2025 · as_of 2026-09-06 World Economic Forum Global Gender Gap Report 2025 · year 2025 · as_of 2026-09-06 Observation notesGGGI score 0–1 (higher=more parity). Global rank 108. Cross-checked vs published 2025 rankings table. Original CSV value: 0.681. |
| Myanmar | —GAP · not zero | — | World Economic Forum Global Gender Gap Report 2025 · year not available · as_of 2026-09-06 Observation notesGAP: Myanmar not covered in WEF GGGR 2025 edition (last ranked 2023). Original CSV value: not supplied. |
Philippines highlighted. Bars start at zero; gaps have no bars. GII sorts from lower to higher inequality; other panels sort by descending value.
Secondary enrolment context
Philippines secondary gender parity index: 1.077 · female/male gross enrolment ratio. Above one means female gross enrolment exceeds male, not equal learning outcomes.
Key findings from this pack
- The Philippines leads the published SEA-11 WEF scores while female participation is lowest among its four peers.
- The Philippine participation gap is wider than Thailand’s and Vietnam’s, but narrower than Malaysia’s and Indonesia’s.
- GII inequality and WEF gender parity measure different constructs with opposite directions.
- Myanmar’s WEF entry is a gap; older parliamentary and enrolment observations retain their years.
Methods & coverage
Participation and percentage-point gaps
Female and male participation use WDI modelled ILO estimates for 2025, aligned with the Labour & youth pack. The gap is male minus female in percentage points, calculated in the supplied pack from the same-year series. ASEAN Key Figures official participation estimates are not substituted. Peer mode includes PH / MY / TH / VN / ID only.
Different composite indices
UNDP GII uses 2023 observations from the HDR 2025 annex; higher values mean more inequality. WEF GGG uses the 2025 edition; higher values mean more gender parity. Scores and global ranks remain separate observations with their own provenance. The indices are not averaged, added or put on one axis. Myanmar’s WEF score and rank are intentional gaps, never zero-filled.
Representation and enrolment vintages
Women’s parliamentary share uses WDI/IPU 2025 observations except Myanmar, whose 2021 value is flagged as older and requires political context. Brunei’s appointed Legislative Council is not an equivalent electoral institution. Secondary GPI has mixed older vintages; the PH observation is 2021. Vietnam’s official GPI series is empty, so the pack explicitly derives its 2022 ratio from female and male gross secondary enrolment. Enrolment parity is not learning parity.
Original gaps & vintage notes · Pack definitions · Research brief
Cite this page
ASEAN in Data (2026). Gender gaps. /topics/gender-gaps